Aidan Kim vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 07:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kim vs T. Zink

USA
1
Win
Played
2
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 2 Zink
They have played 8 sets in total, with Aidan Kim winning 3 and Tyler Zink winning 5. The last match between Aidan Kim and Tyler Zink was at the M25 Wichita, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Aidan Kim getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 1 |
| Zink | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Wichita(06-11-25)
(QF) M25 Louisville(10-11-24)
(SF) M15 Huntsville(08-16-24)
A. Kim vs T. Zink H2H Profile
A. Kim vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- Kim has a lower second serve point win rate (37.5%) compared to Zink, who has 43.9%. Can this indicate that Zink might have a stronger second serve performance?
- Kim excels in winning points on opponents' second serves at 46.15%, slightly higher than Zink's 44.43%, giving Kim an edge in return games.
- Zink shows better performance under pressure with a 52.7% breakpoint save rate compared to Kim's 40%, suggesting Zink may handle crucial moments more effectively.
- Kim's annual match win rate is higher at 75%, whereas Zink's is 67.5%, indicating overall stronger performance consistency for Kim.
- Both players perform well on different surfaces: Kim excels on Hard courts with 64% wins, while Zink has a slight edge on I.hard with a 62% win rate.
- In head-to-head encounters, Zink leads with 2 victories, whereas Kim has yet to secure a win, highlighting Zink's psychological advantage.
- Zink has a better record against lower-ranked opponents, indicating success against players ranked 406.5 on average, compared to Kim's 275.44.
- When the match progresses into a deciding set, Zink boasts a 77% win rate, outperforming Kim's 64%, hinting at Zink's endurance.
- Kim lags in converting breakpoints, achieving only 16.67% compared to Zink's 30.57%, suggesting that Zink seizes chances more effectively.
- In their most recent match on a Hard surface, Zink demonstrated dominance by winning comprehensively with scores of 6-1, 6-2.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent form, Zink holds a marginally better second serve performance and exhibits stronger resilience under pressure, giving them a tactical advantage.
Despite Kim’s superior annual win rate, Zink's success in head-to-head matchups boosts their psychological edge. The ability to convert breakpoints more effectively further strengthens Zink's standing.
Although Kim displays strength against higher-ranked opponents, Zink’s proficiency in handling intense deciding sets aligns with their past head-to-head victories.
Considering all factors and recent performance, Tyler Zink appears more likely to win the upcoming match against Kim.
Aidan Kim vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Kim vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 34 | Games Won | 38 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:53:13 | Average Match Time | 1:53:13 |
| 60% (118/198) | 1st Serve % | 61% (142/234) |
| 72% (85/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (99/142) |
| 55% (44/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (49/92) |
| 42% (8/19) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (8/18) |
| 37% (86/234) | Return Points Win % | 35% (69/198) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Kim Recent Matches Played
T. Zink Recent Matches Played

A. Kim vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.04% (65/47) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.35% (100/84) |
| 57.79% (152/111) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.28% (218/199) |
| 52.50% (1322/1196) | Games Win/Loss | 50.91% (2047/1974) |
| 62.71% (37/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 483 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 283 | Total Double Faults | 377 |
| 1:35:3 | Average Match Time | 1:34:37 |
| 450.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.46 |
| 63% (4363/6958) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6874/11715) |
| 68% (2975/4363) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4849/6874) |
| 50% (1294/2595) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2420/4841) |
| 43% (303/707) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (420/1096) |
| 41% (2783/6870) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4331/11400) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Challenger W/L | 43.75% (21/27) |
| 61.39% (62/39) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 59% (65/110) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (99/183) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
| 49% (18/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 86% (66/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
| 14% (66/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
| 20% (46/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (83/12) |